Gene Machine: The Race to Decipher the Secrets of the Ribosome

Product Information

through their complementary bases to form the double-stranded molecule. This process is called annealing. We can join two different sources of DNA

When we have a clear goal in mind, we think we are struggling to reach a summit. But there is no summit. When we get there, we realize we have just climbed a foothill, and there is an endless series of mountains ahead still to be climbed." Ramakrishnan is an affable and deceptively driven figure. The brief glimpses into his personal life he allows are mostly self-effacing episodes. He strikes this chord so often it is hard to judge its authenticity. On his science, Ramakrishnan is voluble, especially embroiled in the competitive dynamics and attribution of credit - the horse race if you will. I imagine this was something his editors encouraged and was likely particularly vivid in his memory given its relevance to his career. Rothberg founded and later sold two successful gene technology companies, 454 Life Sciences and Ion Torrent. You don’t shy away from referring to your insecurities, apprehensions and the occasional embarrassment. While you laud Yonath’s vision, you are also critical of her in some instances. Richard Dawkins says you write with “disarming frankness”. How hard was it to be brutally honest about yourself and your competitors when you were writing it? Did you think of editing some sections out at any point? The field was flourishing and new discoveries were constantly being made. What do you mean by ‘promised land’? What you mean is lots of opportunities. So in that sense you’re right. In a way molecular biology was a ‘promised land’ as well.This detailed lesson explores how a range of methods are used to produce fragments of DNA as part of the recombinant DNA technology process. Both the engaging PowerPoint and accompanying resources have been written to cover the first part of point 8.4.1 of the AQA A-level Biology specification and also provides information that will prove useful for the other lessons in this sub-topic on the polymerase chain reaction and using transformed host cells. I didn’t expect that level of press and public recognition, although oddly Britain was the one place where I was hardly recognised. None of the TV stations featured me on their newscast. I wasn’t in the print edition of most of the British newspapers. You would’ve thought that the fact that somebody from the US took a factor-of-two cut in salary to come and do science in Britain would’ve made a great story for British science and for Britain. It was a little odd. Winning a Nobel Prize does not mean that you’re a genius. It doesn’t even mean that you’re very smart. Mirjam Kummerlin has won a prestigious Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds fellowship to join us for her PhD/DPhil. Congratulations, and welcome to the group! The use of restriction endonucleases and ligases to insert fragments of DNA into vectors. Transformation of host cells using these vectors. Students should be able to evaluate information relating to screening individuals for genetically determined conditions and drug responses.

One element of this story that impressed me most was Dr. Ramakrishnan’s unfailing generosity to his collaborators and his competitors alike. In fact, one of the key themes in this book is that most contemporary science is not about individual achievement; rather, it’s a synthesis of ideas and progress by teams of highly dedicated individuals who devote their lives to solving questions they find compelling. Xiaojuan Li from Beijing Forestry University joins us as an Academic Visitor, to work with us on single-molecule imaging. November 2019: I remember reading Craig Ventner's book about racing to sequence the human genome. It read like a novel. I couldn't look away as Ventner spilled all the secrets about his personal life as well as all the nasty, behind the scenes antics that arise when scientists compete. I remember thinking he seemed a bit bitter, but I didn't care because I wanted to know everything I could about this usually hidden side of scientific discovery. Ramakrishnan's book is very similar in that it allows the reader to witness the arguments, insecurities, and questionable tactics scientists engage in when trying to outdo each other.I think [being] an outsider allows you to see things with a fresh perspective that isn’t obvious to people who are either part of the culture or part of the field. They are used to thinking in a certain way. And you come in there and say, “Wait a minute. Why is everybody doing it like this?” When people come in from a different field or different country, they bring a new perspective sometimes. That’s why I’m a big fan of people moving around in science. Science often benefits from this global [churn]. I’m a big fan of people moving around in science We've gone faster than anybody thought we could," says Illumina Chief Jay Flatley. He says he'll continue to dominate the competition. evaluate appropriate data for the relative influences of genetic and environmental factors on phenotype. The ribosome, as you put it, lies at the crossroads of life itself because it forms a crucial link between genes and proteins. But since the double helix was discovered, it’s taken several decades for us to understand the ribosome and how it works. Is it merely because of the molecule’s complexity?

Ramakrishnan never bragged about his abilities and always spoke very respectfully of his fellow scientists. However, some chapters did feel a bit long-stretched, particularly when mentioning many of his graduate students and postdocs throughout the years and then referring to them by their first name, which might confuse some readers. Jonathan and his wife Bonnie Rothberg live in a large waterfront home in Sachem Head. The house is facing the Long Island Sound. No, the real debt we owe to James Watson is the part that would not have happened if someone else had taken his place, and that is the fact that "The Double Helix" is such a gossipy, snarky, utterly human tale. No other scientist before him, that I am aware of, wrote for popular consumption such an unabashedly human tale of how science actually gets done, full of rivalries and mistakes and emotional conflict and non-scientific concerns intruding into the lives of the people trying to figure out how the world works. But, once Watson had written his book, it appears to me that it made it more acceptable, expected even, that if a great scientist is going to tell their story, they should admit to all of the gossipy, political, emotional, irrational pushing and pulling that can both impede and occasionally propel them on their path to discovery. Ramakrishnan is not, I think, by nature the sort to do that, but he has given us a great tale here, and I think a great part of why is that Watson has made it acceptable to tell a story about science in a way that fills it with humans. At the heart of the personal genome machine is a silicon chip with 21 million transistors on it--the equivalent of a desktop computer circa 1995. On top of the chip is a tiny channel the width of two human hairs into which DNA is fed. Each DNA molecule in the body contains two long strands of chemical letters, or bases--A,T, C and G--that come together like a twisted ladder (a.k.a. the double helix). The machine takes a single DNA strand and uses an enzyme to attach bases to it. Every time the enzyme connects two bases--an A to a T or a C to a G--an electrically charged ion is released and detected by sensors on the machine. By exposing the DNA sample to only one letter at the time, the machine can reconstruct the entire sequence.There are still respected scientists who think genomic sequencing is doomed to stay forever in the labs, absorbing funds in absurd proportion to the benefits they provide. Cynics are advised to recall what Kenneth Olsen, founder of minicomputer maker Digital Equipment Corp., once told the World Future Society: "There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home."

This profoundly human story is written with honesty and humility, and the author isn’t afraid to laugh at himself. For example, his story about the phone call in October was amusing, and he even shares his wife’s incredulous response when she first learned he had won the Nobel Prize: “I thought you had to be really smart to win one of those!” (p. 237). What Malvolio said in Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night equally applies to Nobels: some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them." Usually, building prequel to such science stories is very challenging. Venki manages it brilliantly- he both tells his personal experience around the story and describes in layman’s-term the concrete science behind. One good thing about such story telling is, the reader can nail the story to a parallel experience from his/her life in general.This cookie, set by Everesttech, is used for targeted ads and to document efficacy of each individual ad. Gene Machine: The Race to Decipher the Secrets of the Ribosome by Venki Ramakrishnan is the standard post-Nobel memoir in some ways. It recounts his biography, his research, and his perspective on science writ large. He vows to have a machine by 2012 that will decode in two hours all 20,000 human genes that code for proteins. (This is roughly 3% of all DNA and will still be far behind Illumina, which can do all the DNA twice.) Eventually, he hopes to create a machine the size of an iPad. "There isn't a technology that we will not pass in a very short period of time," he says. "It doesn't matter how far ahead they are."